From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Morgan Willcock Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TAGS completion with (setq-local completion-ignore-case t) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:54:31 +0000 Message-ID: <87bk7qqsdk.fsf@ice9.digital> References: <87frx2qu8z.fsf@ice9.digital> <868r2u2x4u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16014"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 07 10:55:39 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riATT-0003uX-0O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:55:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riASY-00039V-Gr; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:54:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riASV-0002zU-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::226]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riASU-0006ru-87; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E9F8C0004; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:54:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ice9.digital; s=gm1; t=1709805272; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6dFVYQ2qXzVFnEyeODBynEg64ywY0K/6mCGifwJESz8=; b=Lh1dT76S6Q/KQDeaySdiDO+JO331io9coq+sQo90nULL2cxHEfgFJOc8dkJoKd3m1ExD2T f3cjqcdSR1zEs1kheeF4XiMYUokTAPKQlKHSCR6FplsecrHy+DTPEOPwIV9BpyBz55usfs CQnwa1zEu24c7DmJah1VX6sz7GCvuJbHo0GfGZF9Cb1m7Rl2J5OIrZvLwJN1Wb4e6/D63i U0JWizEAlMBRFq+Xd1VfRmvLOxUYByPe/X04hDF6AlriYGMl51/zAZYJEwT3EpVqUF30F2 L61o44RzJHriMDosXgABaGDZVZfm2EpLj5BBuOSq/VyisPz8HzXp1UXDQaZd5A== In-Reply-To: <868r2u2x4u.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:45:37 +0200") X-GND-Sasl: morgan@ice9.digital Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::226; envelope-from=morgan@ice9.digital; helo=relay6-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316879 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Morgan Willcock >> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:14:04 +0000 >> >> I was trying to track down an issue with inconsistencies in completion >> matching between a custom capf function and the default TAGS capf >> function. >> >> It seems that if a buffer is configured for case-insensitive completion >> matching, by setting the buffer-local value of completion-ignore-case to >> t, this does not have any effect on TAGS completion. >> >> In order to get case-insensitive completion matching for TAGS, I had to >> also set the buffer local value of completion-ignore-case to t in the >> TAGS buffer. >> >> Is there a technical reason why TAGS completion cannot use the value of >> completion-ignore-case that is set in the buffer where completion is >> initiated, or is this a bug in the implementation? > > If you mean completion when you type "M-.", then this has its own user > option, tags-case-fold-search. Is that what you want? I am talking about completion as initiated by the complete-tag command. (Setting tags-case-fold-search to t does not change the result, whether set buffer-local or globally). -- Morgan Willcock