From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5a125fb5a97 1/2: Update to Org 9.7.3 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:44:02 +0000 Message-ID: <87bk44df0d.fsf@localhost> References: <171796793548.23337.12512115872160390161@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240609211858.A2C31C1F9FB@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87ed927ris.fsf@kyleam.com> <86frti1r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <87tthy71xw.fsf@localhost> <864j9y1fge.fsf@gnu.org> <86wmmuyuk1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4676"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , kyle@kyleam.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 13 17:43:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sHmbp-0000wo-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHmap-0003oy-SA; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHmao-0003od-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHmal-0002uW-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF105240103 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:42:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718293341; bh=plOPRQQIKjoddV6ThoyCCRS01459TY06MJbPbEau5ho=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=i5YBFKdvUOaDe5PrbWB2yKQQT2SMIpAOqYVINizvRtpodMbG0keYHO4POOwU4bw2V LnZj/AJsawxsm+w8PBZCxCv0UdM2rdqBcv0FY4j2+NgnJdu9ahcqIDtq4J0nTitbGm xjzMdAAZXKsiR94Loso1f+xncCB+shEte9XStpQm05yEYLHtRi0hgkkiqgaDfnI2/y UgwExL4Ms7HF1kSqvJHU2ZG8tXRHJxlqQw3ula2LTWRpcumaER5i4/9zJ1IGVw64PE wdXGFi7YlrAC5SvI7UrBUHhX3n7FHzgMUgFp5ZZw2c4aSgR1YEv0VP2DAW208wm/vK vAncDbUHCqcdw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W0RVh18Nzz6trs; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:42:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <86wmmuyuk1.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320026 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I don't think this argument is very convincing: getting the info "from >> org.org via an awk script" is not that different from getting it "from >> org.org via org-export plus install-info". > > If we could use install-info, we didn't need that script at all. The > comments in the top-level Makefile explain why we don't use > install-info for generating DIR in the build tree. I am seeing ## FIXME: ## If info/dir is missing, but we have install-info, we should let ## that handle it. If info/dir is present and we do not have install-info, ## we should check for missing entries and add them by hand. Does it mean that making use of install-info would be fine, if it is available? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at