Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Manuel Giraud >> Cc: 74111@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:04:22 +0100 >> >> >> Maybe we could change it to "highlighted letters (or digits)". But >> >> FWIW, "marked letters" was not really more clear before this patch. So >> >> I think we could try to rewrite tmm-completion-prompt with something >> >> clearer that work for both options. WDYT? >> > >> > I agree, please suggest a better text that caters to both cases. >> >> What do you think of this new version of the patch? > > LGTM, thanks. > >> I removed the >> "PageUp" comment as it does not seem to work (while 'M-v' is) > > PageUp does work here, so I think we should leave that sentence, but > modify it to say "M-v/PageUp". > >> +*** New user option 'tmm-shortcut-inside-entry'. >> +When non-nil, insert the character shortcut of a menu entry inside its > > The "insert...inside its string" is not really accurate, is it? The > code tries to highlight a character that already exists in the choice > string, and prepends a digit if it fails to find such a character. > >> +(defcustom tmm-shortcut-inside-entry nil >> + "Place the shortcut character into the menu entry's string. >> +When non-nil, the shortcut character will be inserted into its menu >> +entry string with a different face to help identifying it. The >> +`tmm-mid-prompt' string is not used then." > > Same here. Here is a new version taking your remarks into account.