From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this a bug in while-let or do I missunderstand it? Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:45:06 +0800 Message-ID: <87bjyjfowt.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <86ldxrliau.fsf@gnu.org> <865xot2y1d.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86ldxoiqzr.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttccvwwj.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , arthur.miller@live.com, ams@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Joost Kremers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 13 10:46:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tB9wy-0001r0-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:46:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tB9wM-00030P-73; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 04:45:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tB9wE-0002sX-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 04:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tB9wB-0005QD-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 04:45:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=GRhAPwW0ho0oNCI3p32ynxvboXJi1LEMTh1q7bCmb2kOLFpRIVrz98Y8g/qS1dhHEFSjTI/PL2IOCAwBPD2nIHa7D5/48B8Z4teYcsh3rUEX0kWE4jL2w84WWQvjcEbbKIrFvdqwwcZuUD1GtsUTSzKWMNpJRSAkiLUX04mz3jK0kjBU357TA7lpeV4wqGhI+JjlYcyOWr0z+BVFitXD/0oNkPiie6vTnTZwaYZvTIhO8figzKmBvP3YG1Fz/hb1jl4l/KsR77zRKRoTjM8xKl9g7FW/hbXa/4/HYLzTalO5HWYctZi2p1EfvmNBdLxTezoGacCy8snXM5/ibrlVKg==; s=purelymail2; d=spwhitton.name; v=1; bh=ct1KXEtyg47Vt0H+6xa+48PKiUlc9T7a8C2fNR9X4UM=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=sFE0OczNlaKyrSmickErNUYofQeekpNJZVk12/3IfqPuH5CuE6R0LTRs27YwmBqflNqGfETCIUn0VQ82KYyDvHiSkA67VZP/Zs2kIbkLtQAtMWDNFDaucEgn5CrCJnG0gKn9Xq0sKR4hhqoe3Y2kf7/tCawMipHRQqPG0y/qvSowNYpTVUFIhwSo+NlnJIc0cSVYYFGHGPAFSJlkpTFQBB4VWf+XQ+wMfc40SotiVP9Ht6W8jUoRSKtpa0M1JCOTo0QdbRR8m+st4ukfvgXK6XGcmFwgIIdbpXIDNWWUSYLTeYdG9TCqRZ1JHG/6gM0HEqHTzsxsI7T/kSfo2WRnhA==; s=purelymail2; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=ct1KXEtyg47Vt0H+6xa+48PKiUlc9T7a8C2fNR9X4UM=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -1859930981; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE8B87E3D9A; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:45:06 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <86ttccvwwj.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Joost Kremers's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:45:48 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325440 Archived-At: Hello, On Wed 13 Nov 2024 at 12:45am +01, Joost Kremers wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Thanks, see some comments below. > > Second proposal attached. Please put the "like let*" back in (the first change in your patch). There is one person who dislikes it but I think the average reader of the Elisp reference will benefit. > BTW, any reason why `while-let` isn't called `while-let*`?) Just what it got named when it got added; probably a less-than-ideal decision, with hindsight. Unlike the if-let/when-let deprecation, it's not worth renaming it. -- Sean Whitton