From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: texinfo.tex change. Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:47:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87acqdjnxm.fsf@xs4all.nl> References: <876513nswn.fsf@xs4all.nl> <874qgn87cu.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107992503 5657 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 23:41:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: belanger@truman.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 10 00:41:42 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz1Sk-0006zK-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:41:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz1hN-0007j8-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:56:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz1gN-0007AI-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:55:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz1gD-000754-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz1gD-00074J-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:55:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.35] (helo=smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cz1Rd-0001Oj-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:40:29 -0500 Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j19NeRNa015939; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:40:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cz1YT-0005Yi-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:47:33 +0100 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:03:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 34 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33167 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33167 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Jay Belanger writes: [...] >> Sorry about that. I knew @LaTeX{} was defined in texinfo; I didn't >> realize that it was a recent addition. >> >> This would affect creation of dvi files; I'm surprised it affected >> bootstrapping, though. Before the texinfo.tex change, I ran 'makeinfo >> calc.texi' and it worked fine. > > I just bootstrapped again after the 22.1 version number update, and it > failed again in calc.texi like this > > calc.texi:740: Unknown command `LaTeX'. > calc.texi:740: Misplaced {. > calc.texi:740: Misplaced }. > > etc... > > so my change to texinfo.tex wasn't sufficient to get rid of this. > > If makeinfo doesn't use it, why do we include it? > > makeinfo --version says: > > makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.3 @LaTeX{} was introduced in Texinfo 4.7 (9 April 2004). I'll update README that currently says that Texinfo 4.2 or later is needed. Lute.