From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Welsh Duggan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug that needs fixing Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:51:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87ackn1sk6.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> References: <87mzpcvpv3.fsf@gmx.de> <87u0ixkie5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <42D62047.3010903@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121475312 10911 80.91.229.2 (16 Jul 2005 00:55:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 16 02:54:59 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dtax7-0001K1-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:54:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dtayv-0003U7-Ul for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:56:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dtay8-00038r-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dtay3-00035z-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dtay2-000357-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [205.201.10.244] (helo=maru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dtb2i-0006Uo-LJ; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: from md5i by maru with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DtauH-0006Ie-Q2; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:51:53 -0400 Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: <42D62047.3010903@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:20:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40974 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40974 Jason Rumney writes: > Shouldn't all responses that do not start with a status code be ignored? > > ie > > "^[^1-9][^0-9][^0-9]" Be careful when negating regexps, as this is seldom as easy as it seems. An actual negation of "^[1-9][1-9][1-9]" would be: "^\\([^1-9]\\|[1-9][^1-9]\\|[1-9][1-9][^1-9]\\)". -- Michael Welsh Duggan (md5i@cs.cmu.edu)