From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Disabled commands Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87acd0b5ha.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87mzhbly89.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r76fkth6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200602080149.k181nhQ21836@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87mzh2ft7f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r76eihbg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871wyeywu5.fsf@jurta.org> <87r76ec926.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139526519 14773 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2006 23:08:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 00:08:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7KtQ-0000G3-3m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:08:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7KtP-0006ay-9W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Jwm-0007Qy-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Jwi-0007N6-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Jwi-0007Mn-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.25] (helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F7K0I-0002kt-31; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.68.216.244]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060209220714.HRWC18394.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F5BED743B; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:07:14 -0500 (EST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:48:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50278 Archived-At: > While on this side-subject, any objection to the patch below? > I do not want not-modified to be disabled. Hmm... I didn't bother to justify my suggestion originally because it seemed obvious to me that it was the right thing to do. Honestly, not only did I not know about the existence of `not-modified' until recently, but I never expected Emacs to provide such a command and even less to bind it to a key like M-~ which can be hit accidentally. I've lost some changes because of it, which is why I suggested to disable it, especially given the fact that I've never used (or even felt the need for) such a command. In what kind of scenario does it make sense to use it? Stefan