From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: weird desktop.el change Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:32:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87abxcqddk.fsf@gmx.at> References: <87d52bbwro.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878xcycx95.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87wt0g2oog.fsf@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176492758 28429 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2007 19:32:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Miles Bader , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 21:32:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HcRVb-0004Kp-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:32:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcRZu-0005s9-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcRZq-0005s4-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcRZo-0005qB-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcRZo-0005q1-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HcRVU-0007Ri-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2007 19:32:27 -0000 Original-Received: from chello062178240212.3.14.tuwien.teleweb.at (EHLO enterprise) [62.178.240.212] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 13 Apr 2007 21:32:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4064391 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19VAcxDZu1V9f/9iQ2uGqRcecMdge8Vhltjj6l2O2 STmbFjpKN+O4k0 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri\, 13 Apr 2007 15\:20\:11 -0400") X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69410 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > PS: I'm not even sure it's a good optimization: in 99% of the cases > it would be better to educate the programmer about mapc by emitting > a warning, The patch does that. > and in 99% of those cases, it'd be even better to replace the > mapc(ar) by a dolist loop. That's quite unrelated.