From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs 22.2] Re: Idle timers with the active minibuffer Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:03:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87ablro05h.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87k5otd3jx.fsf@jurta.org> <87ir0fqxlz.fsf_-_@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203800759 11856 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2008 21:05:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5?= =?utf-8?Q?rd?= To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 23 22:06:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JT1Zc-0004vI-6x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:06:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT1Z6-00069H-NA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT1Yi-0005g9-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:05:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT1Yg-0005f2-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:05:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT1Yg-0005el-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JT1Yc-0004oH-7F; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 540874E495; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:03:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ir0fqxlz.fsf_-_@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat\, 23 Feb 2008 21\:46\:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90156 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >> There is a NUMBERP test in both versions. >> >> That is correct. (I find it hard to read unified format diffs.) >> So it won't crash. >> >> It looks like reverting the keyboard.c change is ok. >> But first let's see what Yidong has to say. >> There must have been a reason why he made that change. > > It seems this bug should be fixed before releasing Emacs 22.2, > because it causes the regression comparing with Emacs 21. But > I don't see what implications revering keyboard.c will have. It appears to be a mistake, and I believe it can be safely reverted.