From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-directory breakage Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 18:23:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87abj4oh3v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20080505152149.E5BB99F054B@snark.thyrsus.com> <857ie8ahr3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87y76ooj4k.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <853aowah55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85y76o91r7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210004604 14374 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2008 16:23:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 05 18:24:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jt3Tl-00012F-Tw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 18:23:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt3T4-00040d-3P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 12:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt3T0-00040Y-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 12:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt3Sy-00040M-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 12:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47137 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt3Sy-00040J-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 12:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.239]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jt3Sy-00035T-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 12:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so567806huc.1 for ; Mon, 05 May 2008 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=OKMvQY9KFQdhx80C9Xkxu8wt1YgreBTWMWVPCO1Kzg4=; b=MuhfrsiizIIoQ+y8zCnhyvIMrhNaJbseSLgpXIw+L+qY7rY3IwfR6DyYBVWjRwskW85sNl5USHahhbPiRIVOk6W1nmIRFggynyrv7HNSgJj/Gtn4+HowA8nYIJVERRBQLOCPOULDBA9P0pXEYpnjFGQmgyugdbbRMPPa/7xT2zI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=JuU1Ve7FnBFq8hb0Upe4g+rT2nMh31P6vbyciia0jeDxA0rHm51Sxov1+9CGHWu8N7cc90yqB5ALjJ3KSKGRzjvffZGskM5iuwNZ9/nyQbsrXoA/HKyAB2XD4dGZmlRyhk4gOKB5UpLIUmZxthnPYzUp16ylTvM2Z9tCf38+Z/Q= Original-Received: by 10.86.49.3 with SMTP id w3mr1538910fgw.57.1210004583196; Mon, 05 May 2008 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [88.140.24.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm5044672fga.4.2008.05.05.09.23.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 May 2008 09:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6FA38157686; Mon, 5 May 2008 18:23:00 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <85y76o91r7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 05 May 2008 18:03:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96509 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > >> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> There is not much I could say about gastroenteritis that would be >>> ontopic in emacs-devel. >> >> "not much" /= "nothing", so I'm dying to know what could you say that >> would be ontopic :-) > > That is a risk I am not going to take. Afraid of being too plethoric? -- Bastien