From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: [OT] Emacs for email? Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:37:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87aay17m3z.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> References: Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFlse-0003l7-V6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:52:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFlsZ-0003jl-8X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:52:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40918 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFlsZ-0003jh-1P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:52:11 -0500 Received: from vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.43]:59912) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFlsY-0000n7-OL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:52:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Keith Lancaster Cc: Org Mode List At Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:34:24 -0600, Keith Lancaster wrote: > > I apologize for the WAY off topic question, but since you folk are > emacs experts....do you use emacs for email, and if so, what do you > use? Org-mode caused me to switch to emacs after programming for 30 > years in other editors, and so like many emacs converts, I'm not > wanting to exit the app :-). I use wanderlust. Works well. I have also used gnus in the past (but just couldn't get comfortable with its world view...). The only thing I would highlight is that, in my experience, emacs based MUAs are slow (say in comparison with mutt) and don't function well with mailboxes with, say, 5000 messages. I've moved to a "0 size mailbox" approach to handling my email (which works well with org and, in fact, requires org to work at all really) so this is not an issue for me. HTH.