From: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: merge conlict?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:24:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aaw2yrec.fsf@telefonica.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2ljfm838l.fsf@igel.home
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es> writes:
>
>> I do "bisect" maybe twice per year. I commit hundreds of times. Guess
>> what's more convenient for me.
>
> What is more convenient for the community?
For Emacs, I'm pretty sure that it is more convenient to have looser
requirements for committing into private branches than to be able to
bisect into merged history.
Please note that it is not a question of bisect or not bisect. It is
always possible to bisect following the leftmost part of the history (as
long as people do not get accustomed to push their changes onto trunk
and break that) and it is possible to re-create the original branch and
bisect it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1NZJ1t-00089o-ST@monty-python.gnu.org>
2010-01-25 7:43 ` merge conlict? Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 8:46 ` Glenn Morris
2010-01-25 9:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 13:54 ` NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream (was: merge conlict?) Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 17:29 ` NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream Mark A. Hershberger
2010-01-25 18:28 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 9:26 ` merge conlict? Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 10:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 10:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 10:30 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 11:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 11:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 11:27 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 11:55 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 12:22 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 12:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 12:48 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 13:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 13:38 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 14:26 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 14:39 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 15:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 15:57 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 16:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 18:06 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 18:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 18:24 ` Óscar Fuentes [this message]
2010-01-25 18:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 18:50 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 19:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 19:21 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 19:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 20:07 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 20:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 21:24 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 21:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 23:19 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 23:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 23:57 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-26 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 15:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-26 18:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 15:15 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-26 17:13 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 17:09 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-26 18:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 22:10 ` David Reitter
2010-01-25 23:35 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 0:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 1:38 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 4:30 ` David Reitter
2010-01-25 13:41 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 13:52 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2010-01-25 12:30 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 1:49 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 4:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 9:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 10:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 10:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 10:06 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 16:49 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 16:49 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 17:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 18:20 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-26 18:42 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-26 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 19:38 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 22:43 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-27 1:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-27 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 10:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 10:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 11:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 12:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 12:43 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 10:27 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 3:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-26 8:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 9:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 10:10 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 10:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 12:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 11:33 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 12:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 12:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 13:17 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 14:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 14:03 ` Interpreting git diff --cc [was: merge conlict?] Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 0:05 ` merge conlict? Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 0:04 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 2:14 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 4:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 16:50 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-28 2:10 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2010-01-28 4:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-28 4:13 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2010-01-28 5:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87aaw2yrec.fsf@telefonica.net \
--to=ofv@wanadoo.es \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.