From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next emacs version? Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:34:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87aau1gxz2.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <56D10E2523764AC98D99CEBC55DBAD93@us.oracle.com> <83iq8sigyq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269207385 7675 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2010 21:36:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:36:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 21 22:36:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtSoW-00031d-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:36:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52920 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NtSoS-0002cS-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:36:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NtSoN-0002cK-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:35:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38687 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NtSoJ-0002cB-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:35:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtSoG-0001Pm-O8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: from host225-22-dynamic.24-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([79.24.22.225]:39104 helo=ambire.localdomain) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtSoG-0001PZ-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NtSnR-0001ru-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:34:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:29:40 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122421 Archived-At: () "Drew Adams" () Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:29:40 -0700 I don't think it's a good idea to try to test against that value. Don't check the regexp value; check the regexp behavior against a (properly chosen) string. This way, you perceive its quality directly. thi