From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7383: 24.0.50; end-of-line style on remote files Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:42:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87aaf2a2v3.fsf@gmx.de> References: <871v0mllx7.fsf@gmx.de> <87wriek4ke.fsf@gmx.de> <87oc3qjxbl.fsf@gmx.de> <87bozmitut.fsf@gmx.de> <87ei4eaa7d.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304524156 11927 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2011 15:49:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7383@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 17:49:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeK7-0004XD-Rx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:49:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52876 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeK7-0002hM-D3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeK4-0002e7-0J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeK2-0000KT-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeK2-0000KP-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeF7-0006jQ-RZ; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7383 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7383-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7383.130452379225779 (code B ref 7383); Wed, 04 May 2011 15:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7383) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2011 15:43:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeEK-0006hk-4D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHeEE-0006h7-2a for 7383@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 May 2011 15:42:59 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB92AF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.146.175] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 04 May 2011 17:42:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX190k58g/mF01zxN+VN4IWuZVE0+pIhkUmFuKmeIoC 1xSvTE2B4k1ZC0 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 04 May 2011 12:14:09 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 11:44:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46207 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I think all this non-binary business in ange-ftp is inherited from > pre-Mule issues. So I'd be tempted to always use binary now. > >> And there are comments about it, like "Binary file transfers between >> machines of different architectures can be a risky business.". > > I can't think of any case where a non-binary FTP transfer will correctly > convert to/from the internal file-format, and where Emacs can't do the > same or better. I don't oppose, but given that I do not use MS Windows, I cannot judge whether this change will harm, or not. OK, let's change to binary transfer. Shall we remove the checks for different systems in the code, or shall we default `ange-ftp-binary-file-name-regexp' to ""? > Stefan Best regards, Michael.