From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion to indicate fixed version when closing a bug Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:32:00 -0500 Message-ID: <87aa6z4o0v.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> References: <83d3bwn7mu.fsf@gnu.org> <5dhb18p7i7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <834nx8mcud.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5ukkucx.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxb05dk7.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <83sjkrllhh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323585136 32344 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2011 06:32:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 06:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 07:32:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZcxG-0004mN-Jf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:32:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60208 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZcxF-0006Ab-Kz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZcxC-0006A0-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZcxA-0008GC-79 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:48382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZcxA-0008G3-1G; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: by qcsd17 with SMTP id d17so3397997qcs.0 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:32:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=AZmtpRIXPiF8RDk80kXLviYwxXhO14cNI+q+8CVjQg8=; b=JMhEojCT3PsQsPCuMhrtiTqfLy2fJqytU43XgkV0KRv+OC7fphO2eVWxlWzUf2CrOH Fy5kurvFXQCtp5fawdcVysUj9lMC+InkNjlGtDCm5yhkO3k8R2JsjWjFMqyJzOVQb62n S203uzVIvy1Vmi0I/osZjubgBM6Q30qTOmjvw= Original-Received: by 10.224.96.72 with SMTP id g8mr12977110qan.56.1323585123394; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:32:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss.red-bean.com (cpe-66-65-49-129.nyc.res.rr.com. [66.65.49.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dm3sm28248407qab.12.2011.12.10.22.32.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:32:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sjkrllhh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:34:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.216.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146642 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Karl Fogel >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:24 -0500 >> >> You meant the version number ("edition", "release", whatever) of Emacs >> in which the bug was fixed, not revision information about the change >> that fixed it. >> >> The latter is what I've been (mistakenly) talking about in this thread; > >I've been mentioning the revision number when closing bug reports >since quite some time ago. Yes, and probably for exactly the reasons I took the trouble to needlessly spell out :-).