From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs and TMUX/StumpWM Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:34:48 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87aa4bf6ef.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87ipj5es0n.fsf@googlemail.com> <87aa4gi74t.fsf@schoepe.localhost> <87ty2kf3ei.fsf@newsguy.com> <87wr7gjamp.fsf@schoepe.localhost> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329910526 21252 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2012 11:35:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:35:26 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 22 12:35:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ATh-0000Hx-3F for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:35:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ATg-0002eS-N0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:35:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ATW-0002eC-J5 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:35:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ATQ-0001Wx-7Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ATQ-0001WU-2T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ATM-0008KU-Kx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:35:00 +0100 Original-Received: from z65-50-57-227.ips.direcpath.com ([65.50.57.227]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:35:00 +0100 Original-Received: from reader by z65-50-57-227.ips.direcpath.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:35:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: z65-50-57-227.ips.direcpath.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RiJ/wEf2zfxkT339esBEMutbCps= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:83832 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> > > Another thing in addition to running emacs as a daemon that might >> > > interest you, is One-On-One Emacs [1] which basically >> > > aims at using a separate frame for each emacs window. >> > > >> > > [1] http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/OneOnOneEmacs >> > >> > Is this still being developed..? comments there are dated 2004. >> >> I'm not sure (I don't use it myself), but the libraries seem to be the >> ones from http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/DrewsElispLibraries >> which seems pretty active. > > Yes, it is still being developed/maintained/used. > > Dunno what 2004 comments Harry is referring to. There have been ongoing > improvements to oneonone.el and the related libraries: 56 change-log comments > for oneonone.el since 2004, the most recent being from 2011/10. And the last > user comment at [1] dates from 2011/07. On the cited page toward the bottom are a few comments with dates from 2004. Those were the only obvious dates I saw there. Perhaps I am misunderstanding, or not noticing other more recent dates.