From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Achim Gratz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13112: 24.2.90; The cygw32 build should disable X11 Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:10:56 +0100 Organization: Linux Private Site Message-ID: <87a9to7hxr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <50C1E941.2080609@cornell.edu> <87k3stiutx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87boe5iscr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <50C2605F.4000207@cornell.edu> <87pq2k7pe8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <50C33150.2060007@cornell.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354975906 30840 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2012 14:11:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 14:11:46 +0000 (UTC) To: 13112@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 15:11:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL8E-00079Q-OB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:11:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL82-0004h5-BK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34647) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7z-0004gk-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7y-0000BE-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:39 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7y-0000B8-78 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL8M-0001C7-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <50C1E941.2080609@cornell.edu> Resent-From: Achim Gratz Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13112 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13549759094573 (code B ref -1); Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2012 14:11:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL88-0001Bh-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL85-0001BY-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7f-00009F-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:20 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:55806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7f-00009B-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7e-0004d3-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7d-000090-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:18 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7c-00008r-Pk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:11:16 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThL7j-0006cW-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:11:23 +0100 Original-Received: from pd9eb5b28.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.91.40]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:11:23 +0100 Original-Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb5b28.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:11:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9eb5b28.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dfKgDM5T/vQXUcwUvD4RuepY+wg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68192 Archived-At: Ken Brown writes: > I wonder why emacs-w32 finds DejaVu Sans Mono on my system but not on > yours? It's certainly possible that you've installed it in Windows as well. I'd simply use another font (or even a wholLy non-existing one). > I guess that's not really relevant to this bug, but it does > mean that I can't currently reproduce the problem and so I can't debug > it. If you can consistently reproduce it, I think you might have to do > it under gdb (or attach gdb when emacs hangs) and see if you can > figure out what's going on. I'll have to sneak it in somehow next week trying to reproduce this on a different machine (running XP for testing) that has a clean Cygwin installation. I've been testing a lot on my own machine for the last few weeks and I don't really trust that installation anymore, but I can't nuke it right now. > I know from previous discussions that you use tcsh as your shell. > Could there be something in your tcsh configuration files that's > interfering? Or is there anything in your environment that could > explain this? Maybe you should try this from a bash shell and a clean > environment. If you want to send me your cygcheck output off list, I > can see if I spot any obvious differences between your system and > mine. I can try it again in bash and I should have nothing non-standard in my .bashrc, but will check again to make sure. I've mentioned tcsh because it is handling job control and some I/O issues differently than other shells and that has been triggering different behaviour in the past. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra