From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13344: 24.3.50; Gnus error c:/dev/fd/0 Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:58:54 +0900 Message-ID: <87a9solfm9.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> References: <83zk0qi38y.fsf@gnu.org> <871ue1ddby.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <83mwwpie2u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357340408 489 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2013 23:00:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nyc4bos@aol.com, larsi@gnus.org, 13344@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 00:00:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGFU-0005lQ-7v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 00:00:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGFD-0000i5-8R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGF3-0000dF-Gg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGF0-0006NV-GA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGF0-0006NH-Dl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGF8-0002Ah-Go; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daiki Ueno Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13344.13573403558232 (code B ref 13344); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2013 22:59:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGEM-00028i-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:59:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGEJ-00028Z-8Q for 13344@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:e41:db5e:fb14::1] (port=40723 helo=debian) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGE8-0002f9-EV; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:59:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83mwwpie2u.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:48:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69393 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> (when (= (call-process "tty" "/dev/fd/0" t) 0) > > I don't think ignoring errors is TRT here. You are invoking a command > that doesn't exist on Windows out of the box; however, if some user, > for some reason, does have that command somewhere on PATH, it _will_ > be invoked, but the results could be unpredictable, because the > command by that name on MS-Windows can be unrelated to its Posix > namesake. > > So it is best to avoid that call on Windows entirely. Okay, changed the code so that it won't be called on Windows. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno