From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: eww Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:34:02 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <87a9mmcrtz@ch.ristopher.com> References: <87d2rkb1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87y5a755e4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371638054 31029 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2013 10:34:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:34:14 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 12:34:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpFiR-0002Ac-En for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:34:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpFiR-0000Jo-0m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45709) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpFiL-0000IY-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpFiI-0004ag-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:46356 helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpFiH-0004aZ-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 0EB54206A9; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:34:02 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1371638043; bh=Y+2CEZeWRxs+Y5cbkD4Giv/xh1MZcbZLEBKazyvIDGY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=1calMBlfRjOwQEemvRZmhNKOgWFHS8Ri1Auy66292NWLZZm1oPwqhxm5KTWQZmvYT 9Jf4z4qfAfVMzKkqZBDQQd6gSVzpKcIFAEmhucn5VQYzO1ElI4GnFiGWbJRmV1IAdc j429rvLgtKFxrdR+7YCzja5pHseceAuXX8TwfPEU= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:51:58 -0400") Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 146.185.21.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160650 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83387 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Another question is that >> `M-x eww RET http://duckduckgo.com/?q=my+user+agent RET' >> says that the user agent of eww is just "URL/Emacs". >> Any respectable browser has a longish text for the User-Agent. >> So its User-Agent would be more informative with something like >> "eww/5.130008 URL/1.1 Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)"... > > I think less is more here. Why do you think so? In my opinion, it does not make any practical difference considering the minimal userbase. Christopher