From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] Bug when updating the hash: meta-lines get deleted
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:11:54 -0700
Message-ID: <87a9g4e3c4.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <86txedkn3o.fsf@somewhere.org> <87iousmtqe.fsf@gmail.com>
	<86zjo44j4q.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44662)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1VrcD5-0008Ql-Pc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:32:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1VrcD1-00032P-6r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:31:55 -0500
Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]:59179)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1VrcD0-00032J-Vp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:31:51 -0500
Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id md12so3161091pbc.5
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:31:50 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:

> Hello Eric,
>
> Eric Schulte wrote:
>>> When results caching is enabled, and when the hash must be updated, the
>>> "meta-lines" in front of the results block are _deleted_.
>>
>> You should use a named code block if you want to decorate the results.
>
> No, as long as the lines which I do insert between the code block and
> the results are of the type "#+...", you _don't_ need to name the block.
>
> Disable the caching, and see by yourself that you can insert such lines
> without problems.
>
> This is something Nicolas did a couple of months ago, to avoid having to
> name all the code blocks when they are semantically followed by their
> results -- that is, such "#+..." lines are like ignored for the update.
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

Alright, I just pushed up a fix for this issue.  Please let me know if
it continues to cause problems for you.

-- 
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D