From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is intellisense features integration in Emacs technically possible? Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:53:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9eofd23.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <1390269670.2888.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <83vbxcfzaa.fsf@gnu.org> <87eh40fx9j.fsf@wanadoo.es> <42135829.UacbDn8H0U@descartes> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390402413 19221 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2014 14:53:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:53:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 15:53:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5zBT-0000ds-KV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:53:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35574 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5zBT-000654-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5zBJ-00062z-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5zBC-00008e-Bf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5zBB-00007z-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:53:22 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5wMw-00064n-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:53:18 +0100 Original-Received: from 231.red-83-41-62.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.41.62.231]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:53:18 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 231.red-83-41-62.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:53:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 231.red-83-41-62.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:scZsaYAiOfZeDcTO4wM0IDgbmXE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168892 Archived-At: Rüdiger Sonderfeld writes: > Why would we have to write a C++ parser and semantic analyzer? If I understood Eli correctly he is advocating the independence of Emacs for that purposes. > There is one in CEDET, there is one in GCC, there is one in libclang, > and there is one in the KDevelop libraries. CEDET is in line with Eli's views, while the other options we should avoid (*) (Except, perhaps, GCC.) OTOH CEDET's internal capabilities for C++ are very limited last time I checked. It is more about "C with classes" with some crude hacks for templates. It does not real C++ semantic analysis. * Again, unless I misunderstood him.