From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kelvin White Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18300: erc-format-target-and/or-network: do not rename server buffers unconditionally Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:13:20 -0400 Message-ID: <87a96z9otr.wl%kwhite@gnu.org> References: <87a96zz04y.fsf@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408547663 4284 80.91.229.3 (20 Aug 2014 15:14:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ivan Shmakov To: 18300@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 20 17:14:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7aU-0001Mq-Gk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7aU-0006hC-1V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7aO-0006h4-V5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7aM-0002wy-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7aM-0002wu-Kd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7aM-0007jD-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87a96zz04y.fsf@violet.siamics.net> Resent-From: Kelvin White Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18300 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18300-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18300.140854762429677 (code B ref 18300); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18300) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2014 15:13:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7a3-0007iY-MT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:38102 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7a0-0007iP-RC for 18300@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe73:3fa6] (port=48981 helo=localhost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7Zz-0001gF-I8; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:13:39 -0400 User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?Q?Goj=C5=8D?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92539 Archived-At: > I find this new behavior mildly confusing, and would rather > prefer an option to turn it off; or the change be reverted > altogether. TBH I had the same thoughts in hindsight regarding it being optional, or but I am not sure I understand how the server buffer name being named to match the network name would be confusing, or unwanted behavior. Thanks for the feedback, I will add the neccesary code.