From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: using commit identifiers in bug reports Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:54:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87a910htv7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> References: <87ppahvcoh.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <8wwq4nochs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87r3uvtxly.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83h9vr2k2o.fsf@gnu.org> <877fwjudm6.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <838ugzzzjr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq4do8fr.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <833871tqmq.fsf@gnu.org> <54C27FB2.3090502@yandex.ru> <83vbjxs0dv.fsf@gnu.org> <87sif1mdj2.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83r3ulry2t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422651296 9981 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2015 20:54:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:54:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 30 21:54:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaY-0006sx-Ge for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:54:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaX-00081v-Ox for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:54:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaV-00081o-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:54:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaU-0004Ar-3Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([2a01:4f8:d15:1b86::2]:36945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaT-0004Af-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:54:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=j+LhWwR2hvoF1M034LajD2ooJ77wds0ceU5ssCTDjUo=; b=c7uzPWhxgObKEPsGVgTErG1i9CS6B31Kq31l9+nuHCqcY+CflMOixoNz0EmLILwW0+5g6xuq35Ha43MbTLpjyAB5b98LtcGLtPKxCKUORUIQrqjyhXTSbU8PFyyRqQTCJDK5s/6p6U3D9U6du9BN4ojAgFsmxjjnRm5ktpgWvgc=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaR-0003f5-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:54:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YHIaK-0002eG-M2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 03:54:36 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <83r3ulry2t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:23:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a01:4f8:d15:1b86::2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182093 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:45:53 +0000 >> I still feel it useful to include the commit identifier somewhere. [=E2=80=A6] > Anyway, this is dragging for too long for such a simple issue. Two > people independently told you that your wording looks awkward and > suggested to amend that. Now that you understand the nature of our > confusion, it's up to you to decide what to do with that observation. I didn=E2=80=99t mean to imply that I=E2=80=99m refusing to try to improve= my wording. (But frankly, I=E2=80=99ve secretly hoped for this discussion to come to some CONTRIBUTE-worthy, commit identifier-friendly suggestion on the issue. As it seems, the plan has failed miserably. Alas.) --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A