From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.diffs Subject: Re: branch scratch/check-declare created (now ed9b018) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:58:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87a90ga3iw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20150214103858.2021.44503@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423929774 4089 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2015 16:02:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-diffs@gnu.org, emacs-devel To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 14 17:02:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMfBC-0001So-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:02:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMfBB-0007J4-AE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMfB7-0007GO-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:02:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMfAy-00037D-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:02:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:37346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMfAy-00036J-Cz; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:02:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi2so17676662wib.1; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:02:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ElUFdO+6g4tWpW9ogl4ALSSqZyd2caRvfwEhbPhF0WA=; b=dImBM2LyaLJ3/pbbgK30OzJhTSx8iGQdRBrhjfHEVJzPf1Mp25ORBg8zW7ZZMaGjY/ OuyxENRjv0pEHtu4dfzrPKfWxhGQkBbQSrHFMzi4C+VNJ/j7YA0ceTJOm1P21G7uN36V BQWv9QrZopEUMZrs79HML3WAyh8ca30u55bqH7zjh88RGZnuB2TtuCe1HVSJzHdcNi2g ZaCcdbVM2YLOfIMokt1Zpfv9a1zgvNRCE8H7M1OR1+cGkNY3tXPvTM/YNm2NGTUPh1FS lFh58VC1OIF1w+juIoywyN/NhPtGi43mG47vI5YvCp4AvwemfA38KSjTWaoZvlqgQaAl V1Pw== X-Received: by 10.180.75.19 with SMTP id y19mr16858665wiv.4.1423929754941; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cb14sm7547184wib.22.2015.02.14.08.02.34 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:18:39 -0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183065 gmane.emacs.diffs:129169 Archived-At: Artur Malabarba writes: > I'm not sure if others will agree with me, but when you're fixing or > adding something to a scratch branch I think it's best to just keep > pushing commits to it (as small as they may be) instead of recreating > the branch. Deleting and recreating a branch produces a bit of noise > on the emacs-diffs list, while pushing small commits makes it much > easier to see what's actually been done. > > The whole point of scratch branches is that their commits are not > final, so you can push tiny commits without having to write changelog > entries for them. Then you only cleanup the branch once, just before > merging it into master (that's when you make sure every commit has a > changelog entry, etc). > > I think that makes it easier for everyone. Less work for the developer > that doesn't need to keep recreating the branch, and less work for > everyone who's trying to keep track of what's been changed in the > branch. > > Artur > > abo_abo pushed a change to branch scratch/check-declare. > > at ed9b018 check-declare.el: Use compilation-style warnings > > This branch includes the following new commits: > > new 3d0ac0f check-declare.el (check-declare-ext-errors): New > defcustom. > new ed9b018 check-declare.el: Use compilation-style warnings Makes sense to me. I'll try to do this from now on. I just got too used to `git push --force` on by github account; overwriting scratch branches is close to that. Oleh