Re: VC mode and git

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>]

Eli Zaretskii writes:

 > You said, repeatedly, that the original instructions didn't use a
 > bound branch, but instead described a "truly distributed workflow".
 > That's factually incorrect.

The latter part of the first sentence still is true; the workflow we
described was truly distributed.  That you lump them together in one
statement as "factually incorrect" suggests that you really don't
understand what you're talking about.

In any case, Richard has seen the light and backed all the way down to
a warning (which is not worth arguing against) and implementation of
the missing vc-push command (which is a good idea).  There's no point
in continuing theoretical discussions just for you and Richard, who
simply don't want to hear them.