From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21435: 25.0.50; file-notify has problems after renames Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:17:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8st9mm8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y4gh47sr.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2s07vaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv2ovlcr.fsf@gmx.de> <83613k7owe.fsf@gnu.org> <87si6og17z.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnzv4r6.fsf@gmx.de> <87egi7o1s1.fsf@gnu.org> <871te7tk9i.fsf@gnu.org> <87oahatt4p.fsf@gmx.de> <87a8sunve8.fsf@gnu.org> <87si6mi2oy.fsf@gmx.de> <87613inkpx.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3m5l1sk.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441973969 25902 80.91.229.3 (11 Sep 2015 12:19:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21435@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 14:19:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNIG-0002v4-0A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:19:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55954 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNIF-0005Ko-9B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNHJ-0003yH-MM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNHG-0006Iq-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNHG-0006Im-Ce for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNHF-0005z9-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tassilo Horn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21435 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21435-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21435.144197382922950 (code B ref 21435); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21435) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2015 12:17:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNGP-0005y6-4T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:46489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaNGN-0005xx-35 for 21435@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D978C20856 for <21435@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:17:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:17:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=Wh9SMtlUcFDVRsuj5OX0HK8Al/Y=; b=dghn4 IL29pIcyiEtWAwM29Z4I274oc7xoG1GuOI3X+89yfOt3ou4NE7ptuO5q0hoWSBmV uKm0BIf0wgylbXoWSikJ38mJet/hQPRl1/iqtIyHYX/yjlWOYrNriXMFLUn6nmfP 0VOQrzL/nq9f2Ibn8GwtNvFQaJfs3gdyeIlJRo= X-Sasl-enc: +zbQpEMaPcM+k50ftxkQ+ETrEsBi9qnMQZzy2nHy+3ts 1441973826 Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.161.110.122]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D0B27C00293; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:17:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3m5l1sk.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:53:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106408 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Thanks. Another point is whether we always can expect that all native > libraries will report exactly the same number of events, and then > whether they report them exactly in the same order (you expect > '(created changed deleted) here). Let's see how the test cases evolve, > maybe we need more tolerant tests. Yes, I'm quite strict right now and IMHO in the current tests, that's the only sensible order of events. But of course if it turns out that with some notification backend we can't achieve that guarantee, it'll be no problem to relax the assertions a bit. >> Hm, then I wonder what causes these extreme delays here. The remote >> autorevert test really takes at least 20 seconds here. But I have no >> issues using TRAMP with its ssh method for accessing really remote >> files... > > Now I see it also, but only when running in interactive mode. In batch > mode, there is no serious delay. Will contact the Tramp maintainer, again. Yes, you are right. I always executed the test interactively and now tried running them from the command line. Indeed, that's way faster. Bye, Tassilo