From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: Regressions from 8.2.10 (8.2.10-35-g19a7d6-elpaplus)	to
 master/maint
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:37:13 +0100
Message-ID: <87a8r3p112.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87611v2ese.fsf@yin.lan> <87r3kj9ese.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<8737wz2cgo.fsf@yin.lan> <871tcidfmn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87si4y2493.fsf@yin.lan> <878u6nnuxd.fsf@yin.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37757)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZrQt6-0005yK-84
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:35:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZrQt1-0002W5-TD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:35:35 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:40306)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZrQt1-0002VD-MJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:35:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878u6nnuxd.fsf@yin.lan> (Jan Malakhovski's message of "Wed, 28
	Oct 2015 10:34:22 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jan Malakhovski <oxij@oxij.org>
Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@altern.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Jan Malakhovski <oxij@oxij.org> writes:

> Okay, so I bisected and found that the offender is
> 9f5e698679aecbed872a2030e4157e5e2b1d87e0. Since then these lines have
> changed, so the following

[...]

> I'm willing to listen, but I seriously doubt there's such a compelling
> argument defending the change. Even when out of `org-agenda-list` in
> plain `org-agenda`, jumping to SCHEDULED or DEADLINE lines is nicer than
> to the heading itself.

I don't know either why that was changed, but there probably was
a reason for it. Bastien may remember it.

Regards,