From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to determine (from Elisp) whether the Emacs frame has focus? Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 01:10:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8qdbi59.fsf@debian.uxu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447722244 32421 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2015 01:04:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 01:04:04 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 02:03:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyUgO-0006NB-Rj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 02:03:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyUgO-0005AV-Ev for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:03:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyThP-0002tP-Cy for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyThL-0007e1-1X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:00:39 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyThK-0007dr-Qc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:00:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyThF-0004Do-6N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 01:00:29 +0100 Original-Received: from nl106-137-244.student.uu.se ([130.243.137.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 01:00:29 +0100 Original-Received: from embe8573 by nl106-137-244.student.uu.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 01:00:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nl106-137-244.student.uu.se Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:95o6cYibu0o3Z6IfJIZ5FS0F3ZE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:108102 Archived-At: Dan Espen writes: > Since there doesn't seem to be an existing Emacs > global variable creating your own using those hooks > isn't all that hackish. Go for it. Most definitely. Also remember, sometimes when there is a "standard" way to do a thing, that may be an even more hackish implementation under the surface. Perhaps the OPs supposedly hackish solution will once replace the "standard" one because it actually is less hackish? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573