From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18300: erc-format-target-and/or-network: do not rename server buffers unconditionally Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:43:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8ovbp0z.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87a96zz04y.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87a96z9otr.wl%kwhite@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451249123 22668 80.91.229.3 (27 Dec 2015 20:45:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 20:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18300@debbugs.gnu.org, Ivan Shmakov To: Kelvin White Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 27 21:45:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIBi-00018M-7l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:45:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIBh-0006uB-HF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:45:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIBd-0006ts-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIBa-0005ak-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIBa-0005ag-Fi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIBa-0008FJ-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 20:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18300 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18300-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18300.145124906231627 (code B ref 18300); Sun, 27 Dec 2015 20:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18300) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2015 20:44:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIAw-0008E3-ET for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:44:22 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIAu-0008Dv-LB for 18300@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aDIAX-0003bo-As; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:43:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a96z9otr.wl%kwhite@gnu.org> (Kelvin White's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:13:20 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aDIAX-0003bo-As MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451853837.73281@6Ty3bZn4eIOtPRe8LmF41g X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110846 Archived-At: Kelvin White writes: >> I find this new behavior mildly confusing, and would rather >> prefer an option to turn it off; or the change be reverted >> altogether. > > TBH I had the same thoughts in hindsight regarding it being optional, > or but I am not sure I understand how the server buffer name being > named to match the network name would be confusing, or unwanted > behavior. Thanks for the feedback, I will add the neccesary code. Was this code added? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no