From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU ELPA commit mails Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8lemw2l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8760w7dk48.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4922a5a.fsf@gmx.de> <87twjplede.fsf@gnu.org> <874mbnpygm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459443023 1278 80.91.229.3 (31 Mar 2016 16:50:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 31 18:50:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1alfnL-0002Zy-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:50:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33398 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alfnK-0005NR-Lg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alfmz-0005NH-RY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alfmv-0004Rp-Ro for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:35273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alfmv-0004Rf-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649C922871 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=X48qxPKDbxbBYJO3Exvu4JHQlEM=; b=ay0U9 cyaaQIwMhUkAW4seMVCUFwdqj0EhQrl4mZB6i53tqqGvrigxaZGA0wEfOqV9NGI+ gYWqFvP/WSWJ2/KPsySz6WKehEu4r+ZKHqKw3+awsiOhaJdG+nwjvpof46QXY/y0 74GjSx1YFkSHdgfUMwCnCl2uCImgCEdpJit4B0= X-Sasl-enc: reDkgI5aFDcFIZIWijcLWxM35m6z/HAsk+9Qyy997/xG 1459442980 Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.161.39.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A1E2F680128; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:40 -0400 (EDT) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:23:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.29 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202510 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> back if it works. I just did a new AUCTeX release but so far the >> commit messages haven't appeared in neither auctex-devel nor >> auctex-diffs but I'm reading those via Gmane which might cause some >> additional delay. > > That's because you first pushed to `elpa` and then to > `externals/auctex`. The scripts couldn't know that the pushes to > `elpa` were actually to the `auctex` package. And then moving things > from one branch to another doesn't send any diffs (it just sends a > single email with a summary of the files changed on this branch). Ah, ok. I'll try to push to externals/auctex first in the future. But I'm not too interested in the diff mails anyway, so if they don't pop up on our auctex-devel list, that's good enough. Thanks, Tassilo