From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: 23966@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#23966: 25.1.50; Frame resizing due to tool bar + Gnus
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:55:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8hkpmq8.fsf@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578754F3.9060800@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:01:39 +0200")
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:01:39 +0200 martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
> ‘frame-height’ is not necessarily a reliable reflection of what you see
> on screen.
Why not? What's more reliable?
>> When the tool bar was enabled in the Gnus Summary buffer, did you see it
>> displayed as I describe in the OP: an empty 8-pixel high strip?
>
> No. I see a 35-pixel high strip. With the following definitions
> adapted from yours
[...]
> and `eval-buffer' of these in an emacs -Q of the release version I get
I assume you mean from emacs-25? With 24.5 I get "Symbol's function
definition is void: frame-geometry".
> Emacs started; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
> Gnus started; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
> Opening nnfolder server on archive...done
> No new newsgroups
> Checking new news...
> Reading active file via nnnil...done
> Checking new news...done
> No news is good news
> Opening nndoc server on /home/martin/tool-bar-Gnus-frame-bug...done
> Tool bar disabled; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 0
> Entered Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 0
> Tool bar enabled; frame pixel height: 657 toolbar height: 35
> Other buffer; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
> Back to Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 657 toolbar height: 35
> Final; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
> You can run the command ‘eval-buffer’ with M-x ev-b RET
> Final; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
>
>
> So the "empty strips" here have a height of 35 pixels while the "normal"
> toolbar has 44 pixels. BTW, before getting the "Tool bar enabled"
> message I briefly see some toolbar contents flashing and getting erased
> immediately thereafter.
I didn't consciously notice that before, but now that you mention it, I
do see that too.
> The entire frame height doesn't change here probably due to rounding and
> size hints. However, when I set `frame-resize-pixelwise' to t it
> changes as follows:
>
>
> Emacs started; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
> Gnus started; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 44
> Opening nnfolder server on archive...done
> No new newsgroups
> Checking new news...
> Reading active file via nnnil...done
> Checking new news...done
> No news is good news
> Opening nndoc server on /home/martin/tool-bar-Gnus-frame-bug...done
> Tool bar disabled; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 0
> Entered Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 648 toolbar height: 0
> Tool bar enabled; frame pixel height: 657 toolbar height: 35
> Other buffer; frame pixel height: 657 toolbar height: 44
> Back to Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 666 toolbar height: 35
> Final; frame pixel height: 666 toolbar height: 44
>
>
> So the pixel height of my frame has increased by 18 (2 times 9 pixels
> from the difference between 44 and 35).
>
> What do you get with my modifications?
On emacs-25 with -Q and frame-resize-pixelwise nil:
Emacs started; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 53
Gnus started; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 53
Reading /home/steve/.newsrc.eld...
Opening nnfolder server on archive...done
No new newsgroups
Checking new news...
Reading active file via nnnil...done
Reading active file from archive via nnfolder...done
Reading active file via nndraft...done
Checking new news...done
Opening nndoc server on /home/steve/tool-bar-Gnus-frame-bug...done
Tool bar disabled; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 0
Entered Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 0
Tool bar enabled; frame pixel height: 621 toolbar height: 8
Other buffer; frame pixel height: 608 toolbar height: 53
Back to Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 645 toolbar height: 8
Final; frame pixel height: 640 toolbar height: 53
On master with -Q and frame-resize-pixelwise nil the results were the
same except for the third to last line:
Other buffer; frame pixel height: 608 toolbar height: 45
On emacs-25 with -Q frame-resize-pixelwise t:
Emacs started; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 53
Gnus started; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 53
Reading /home/steve/.newsrc.eld...
Opening nnfolder server on archive...done
No new newsgroups
Checking new news...
Reading active file via nnnil...done
Reading active file from archive via nnfolder...done
Reading active file via nndraft...done
Checking new news...done
Opening nndoc server on /home/steve/tool-bar-Gnus-frame-bug...done
Tool bar disabled; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 0
Entered Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 576 toolbar height: 0
Tool bar enabled; frame pixel height: 621 toolbar height: 8
Other buffer; frame pixel height: 621 toolbar height: 53
Back to Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 666 toolbar height: 8
Final; frame pixel height: 666 toolbar height: 53
On master with -Q and frame-resize-pixelwise t the results were the
same except for the last three lines:
Other buffer; frame pixel height: 621 toolbar height: 45
Back to Summary buffer; frame pixel height: 658 toolbar height: 8
Final; frame pixel height: 658 toolbar height: 53
Steve Berman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-13 12:16 bug#23966: 25.1.50; Frame resizing due to tool bar + Gnus Stephen Berman
2016-07-13 17:34 ` martin rudalics
2016-07-13 19:21 ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-14 9:01 ` martin rudalics
2016-07-14 9:55 ` Stephen Berman [this message]
2016-07-14 17:33 ` martin rudalics
2016-07-14 19:14 ` Stephen Berman
2018-04-12 15:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2018-04-13 9:16 ` Stephen Berman
2020-07-19 16:02 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-07-20 9:10 ` Stephen Berman
2020-07-20 9:31 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-07-20 9:50 ` Stephen Berman
2020-07-23 15:25 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-07-20 9:33 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-07-20 9:43 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-08-04 9:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
[not found] ` <87mu3arc6u.fsf@gnus.org>
2022-04-30 16:18 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a8hkpmq8.fsf@gmx.net \
--to=stephen.berman@gmx.net \
--cc=23966@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.