From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton@gmail.com>, 25030@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode'
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:14:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a7v3trww.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3f4a4f9-9e43-4916-be53-91247b33138e@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:35:43 -0700 (PDT)")
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>> I disagree. The interpreter and byte compiler do not care about the
>> indentation style that you choose for your code: the syntax and
>> semantics are unaffected.
>>
>> Style choices should not produce warnings. An indication that code layout
>> is following an unusual style may be useful, but it should be optional, and
>> it should not use the warning face (it should have a separate face that can
>> be customised independently of the warning face).
>
> What Andy said. This has nothing to do with byte-compiling
> (or interpreting, for that matter).
I don't understand why you guys are all of a sudden talking about
byte-compiling.
> It should be easy for users to give the face(s) used for
> stylistic highlighting different appearance(s) from standard
> Emacs faces that have other meanings.
Anyway, if this just about reorganizing the faces used, I have no
objections.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-25 23:12 bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode' Klaus-Dieter Bauer
2016-11-27 20:38 ` Philipp Stephani
2018-03-14 1:49 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-03-18 19:53 ` Andy Moreton
2018-03-18 21:32 ` Drew Adams
2018-03-19 23:53 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-03-20 0:23 ` Andy Moreton
2018-03-20 1:35 ` Drew Adams
2018-03-20 2:14 ` Noam Postavsky [this message]
2018-03-20 12:55 ` Andy Moreton
2018-03-22 2:38 ` Noam Postavsky
2022-02-12 8:54 ` bug#25030: elisp: highlighting of unexpected indentation should use separate face from highlight of error functions Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a7v3trww.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=npostavs@gmail.com \
--cc=25030@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=andrewjmoreton@gmail.com \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.