From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User interaction from multiple threads Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:52:50 +0800 Message-ID: <87a7pl4bod.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <838t59j821.fsf@gnu.org> <5B73DF10.5070200@gmx.at> <87muto5998.fsf@gmx.de> <5B73ED7E.5000102@gmx.at> <87in4b6hwf.fsf@gmx.de> <5B741C4E.6060403@gmx.at> <83sh3fin70.fsf@gnu.org> <5B756C41.1040600@gmx.at> <83a7pmifvd.fsf@gnu.org> <5B76782F.6060303@gmx.at> <83mutlh1s8.fsf@gnu.org> <5B7688AE.70205@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534495899 12807 195.159.176.226 (17 Aug 2018 08:51:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 08:51:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 17 10:51:35 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaTm-0003D9-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 10:51:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60675 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaVt-0007PH-CP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 04:53:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaVJ-0007P1-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 04:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaVE-0005WA-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 04:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40604 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaVD-0005V5-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 04:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaT2-0002IF-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 10:50:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:oKfupuX2JadikMjZoKVVj1+tuzs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228630 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> You might be thinking about some mechanism we don't have, and didn't >> discuss yet, because currently windows and buffers are not "owned" by >> threads. > > That's what I meant in my first post of this thread with "If we make a > rule that each thread owns a frame with a minibuffer,". I wonder if child frames could be somehow extended for this purpose.