From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC]: replace-region-contents Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:52:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7j5xs1e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871s4rqk7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87o97syvno.fsf@gnu.org> <878syubwv3.fsf@gnu.org> <87y36u9xqt.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1ietcox.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1iew3u6.fsf@gnu.org> <83va1wsy95.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8dgetp1.fsf@gnu.org> <83mun8styg.fsf@gnu.org> <87lg2saiz9.fsf@gnu.org> <871s4idzb2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef8iotr6.fsf@gnu.org> <87o97lltjj.fsf@gnu.org> <83pns1nza8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="5922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 09 09:53:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsONr-0001P1-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:53:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsONq-0000JX-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 03:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsONi-0000JR-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 03:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsONh-0003kf-7O; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 03:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:46813) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gsONh-0004Oy-3f; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 03:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF202174F; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 03:53:00 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 09 Feb 2019 03:53:00 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrleefgdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufhffjg fkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomhepvfgrshhsihhlohcujfhorhhnuceothhs ughhsehgnhhurdhorhhgqeenucfkphepleefrddvfeeirdduvdelrdehvdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p5dec8134.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.236.129.52]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3685CE4046; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 03:52:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83pns1nza8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:26:07 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233162 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Tassilo Horn >> Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 01:00:48 +0100 >> >> Shall I also move replace-region-contents from subr.el to subr-x.el? > > It isn't important enough to argue about it, but our policy AFAIU was > to put new functions in subr-x.el, so there's a slight edge in favor > of that. That's fine with me, so I'll move it. Bye, Tassilo