From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15653: 24.3; call-interactively not sending keys Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:21:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87a7c7mqtf.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87zhkb3ywn.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <83k1bcntta.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="258832"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: matthew.fidler@gmail.com, 15653@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 17 23:23:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz6Al-0015B9-Uj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 23:23:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38044 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hz6Ak-0002SF-8D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hz69D-0001BO-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hz69C-00068u-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hz69C-00068o-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz69C-0008MK-GM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15653 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 15653-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15653.156607686932048 (code B ref 15653); Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15653) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2019 21:21:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56911 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz68L-0008Kp-J4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz68J-0008Kg-KI for 15653@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [50.225.213.182] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz68F-0003vJ-D2; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 23:21:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k1bcntta.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:18:41 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165283 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes, it _is_ the interactive spec. When that spec uses 'e' or '@' or > something else that needs to analyze the invoking events, then Emacs > provides the information from KEYS instead. > > I don't really see hat needs to be clarified in the docs, but given > the above, perhaps Lars or Matthew could propose a clarification? The confusion that both Matthew and me had here was that the doc string talked about "inquiring what events that invoked it", and `this-command-keys' talks about "return the key sequence that invoked this command". So it's not an unnatural inference to make that these things are somehow tied together. I've now clarified the call-interactively doc string to say explicitly that the argument affects the return value of the interactive spec of FUNCTION. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no