From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40151: 28.0.50; Remove Date header from message-draft-headers Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:23:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87a74bc53t.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87mu8bymrx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39842"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40151@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 20 18:25:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLOS-000AFu-Bq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:25:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLOR-0003sl-8C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLOK-0003sS-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLOI-0000xD-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLOI-0000x9-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLOI-0001ms-HA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40151 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40151-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40151.15847250426767 (code B ref 40151); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40151) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2020 17:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLNJ-0001l2-Qe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLNH-0001kn-Gr for 40151@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:24:00 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFLN8-0001H2-QP; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:23:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mu8bymrx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:11:14 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177568 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > It was noted on gnus.general that it's weird to have the Date header as > part of the default value of `message-draft-headers'. Having it in there > means that a Date header is generated (and fixed) when a message is > first saved or delayed, not when it is sent. In the case of delayed > messages, in particular, it's weird that the eventually-sent message can > have a Date header days or weeks in the past. > > Is there any interest in changing the default value? Sure; makes sense to me. Perhaps it should be documented in the "postpone" command(s), too. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no