From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Un-deprecating oset
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:06:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a72d42h2.fsf@bernoul.li> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvmu6m1nrj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Well, it seems nobody else (who has noticed so far) shares my opinion
(enough to comment here). I'll go replace my uses of `oset' now.
I still think it doesn't make sense to remove `oset' while keeping
`oref', which I said best in the only part of my earlier mail that
you did not quote:
> - If `oset' is so bad, then `oref' must be just as bad, right?
>
> If we commit to keeping `oref' around, then why not do the
> same for `oset'? If we commit to never remove one of these
> two, then why even bother removing the other? As long as we
> keep `oref', the ghost of `oset' will hang on, and now you
> have not only a mess but a *haunted* mess.
But I won't keep arguing that opinion because I don't want to risk
that you actually end up removing `oref' as a result well. ;D
Jonas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 10:34 Un-deprecating oset Jonas Bernoulli
2020-05-05 10:48 ` Philippe Vaucher
2020-05-05 11:11 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2020-05-05 14:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-05-12 15:06 ` Jonas Bernoulli [this message]
2020-05-12 16:49 ` Philippe Vaucher
2020-05-12 21:47 ` Adam Porter
2020-05-13 13:04 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-05-14 7:50 ` Juanma Barranquero
2020-05-14 12:13 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2020-05-14 12:31 ` Juanma Barranquero
2020-05-17 21:19 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2020-05-24 20:09 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2020-05-25 15:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-25 16:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-05-25 16:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-03 14:03 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2020-06-03 17:03 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2020-06-06 7:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-06 16:43 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2020-06-08 12:42 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2020-05-25 17:27 ` Jonas Bernoulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a72d42h2.fsf@bernoul.li \
--to=jonas@bernoul.li \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.