From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs as a translator's tool Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:51:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87a70z9naq.fsf@ebih.ebihd> References: <871rn35lqc.fsf@mbork.pl> <87zh9r45ad.fsf@mbork.pl> <87h7vz2m5g.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87d06k4rmg.fsf@mbork.pl> <87eeqzmanl.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <877dwmoboq.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bllypckg.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87tuzpmnuo.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bllu4lx0.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87blluxfcq.fsf@mbork.pl> <1rmqrrvn.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87sgf5xry2.fsf@mbork.pl> <87ftb5qodp.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87ftb4xcf4.fsf@mbork.pl> <87h7vkklij.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87r1umwsff.fsf@mbork.pl> <87r1um391m.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87mu58vzhr.fsf@mbork.pl> <87o8poymc7.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87imfvx6sc.fsf@mbork.pl> <87eeqb9nhs.fsf@ebih.ebihd> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="126292"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:otI22PRiQDKTTidhHu1N1gADqmE= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 19 15:55:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmHUU-000Wkl-Mu for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:55:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmHUT-0001Au-N5 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmHU4-00019n-3q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:52024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmHU1-0001FH-44 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmHTy-000WCT-Ky for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:55:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.161.202; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/19 09:47:02 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123407 Archived-At: > The byte compiler is in Elisp so maybe there is > a comment in the code or something where they > motivate why they give that warning or provide > pointer to further reading... OK, no, the source [1] has this part: (defun byte-compile-save-excursion (form) (if (and (eq 'set-buffer (car-safe (car-safe (cdr form)))) (byte-compile-warning-enabled-p 'suspicious)) (byte-compile-warn "Use `with-current-buffer' rather than save-excursion+set-buffer")) (byte-compile-out 'byte-save-excursion 0) (byte-compile-body-do-effect (cdr form)) (byte-compile-out 'byte-unbind 1)) Well, hell, worth a shot... BTW, bytecomp.el itself relies heavily on `with-current-buffer' so in a way it makes sense it suggests it :) [1] /usr/share/emacs/26.1/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal