From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 11:00:42 -0700 Message-ID: <87a6sezbg5.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuqunw6q.fsf@telefonica.net> <835z3a5miu.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn1f2dlf.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87h7mn2122.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87mtwfyty6.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <83im72lhh6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, matt@rfc20.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 22:42:08 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9EIJ-0000uc-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:42:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42046 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9EII-0003si-LK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ApF-000122-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:59:53 -0500 Original-Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:55329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ApC-0004kR-4r; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E925C0195; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:59:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:59:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=NAug2W8B/D5vBwjVMwuoa7QlZM Kdc92w7vtD7OVLTk4=; b=G4pC+cqH/xnA+afWGRnG0JMfs6gUOS6JAKChOs2YIm gPqeH79fzbmpoNb+aCXdrEvhDZWcTAB0Bta+TPUNyMBJ61S7pokS1qyZv68/sLy0 IUHZ9Z6c4BYmholUoDuqsdku9AdaFdKgR1aG6q1fhTv2Z+afu/ewqbwYISBlE0LW vieYLeNQAZtCvoNUDcUuLEUq2QwGTutOGSRIJ053FIdUPaVl6O0Dzo3ijbbldgSh KJTBoocPuBkuhh5vtvVe3GZdiKokR6ztEXvjf6uz74T9ryQnhZM8rUxg9J3hTJEc fHib/rKjzAlPyfTmcIR66/NeJDmTFv0AiqoFv7BvztmA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=NAug2W 8B/D5vBwjVMwuoa7QlZMKdc92w7vtD7OVLTk4=; b=euN4UDKVWEhJlChGZs8MIa 4UmFErZp79FzmPYMavS8Nof37g6gCM0cFdxWMMrN73Nl72BD1k9F4fHyYc8P0aKN fwNhTKkAcMDDNgB3efCXD8pgddSBm+XsBCZBCm9SHTkKEdZxvC3zqDCJysQVLsFF vn04bChhWQIZP3eIXamoVrQp/A1n/TWFkPan0IEiCpFTdb/Qxz3zU4IvF7oZvj8n iyn0eK4trqustJF9WgF6GZhj/vFDPueG/vS2qnyFwQvHDdfMpownhFmeAzptoIeN 6+0PI+NeDEQ3wryP/D4VW/4dJwgw67skCRNbXHQL3KlrpyvtTNpRQ+dMs52efO/A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheefgddutdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghnucgh hhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddvheegfffhffdvfeefhffgjefflefhteevffffkeetgfdt jedtiedvtdevheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: <83im72lhh6.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264181 Archived-At: Hello, On Mon 08 Feb 2021 at 05:14PM +02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Sean Whitton >> Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 23:06:25 -0700 >> Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> > Which brings me to: if the point is to make certain kinds of bugs more >> > discoverable, adding that feture to debbugs is another option. For >> > example, if the bugs tagged "interface change" were interesting, debbugs >> > could send updates for such bugs to an "interface change" mailing list >> > that interested people could subscribe to. >> >> Well, you'd have to have debbugs mail the entire bug log to that mailing >> list at the point at which it gets tagged, which seems a bit awkward. > > That shouldn't be necessary: we have Gnus and Rmail commands to > download the entire bug DB as a series of folders, and thereafter the > messages can be manipulated locally. See the debbugs package in ELPA. Ah thanks. I wrote some integration between debbugs and notmuch.el for use in the Debian project, but it's not very good, and perhaps I can replace it with some of that code. -- Sean Whitton