From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Protesilaos Stavrou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs master: different (ugly) font in org-mode [Windows, macOS] Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 07:27:32 +0300 Message-ID: <87a6jlv4qz.fsf@protesilaos.com> References: <1758826875.387473.1633124447794@mail1.libero.it> <87a6jsqbhq.fsf@protesilaos.com> <1048176278.452440.1633374684696@mail1.libero.it> <87sfxgr320.fsf@protesilaos.com> <83sfxf4rs2.fsf@gnu.org> <1638550012.538.1633441275953@mail1.libero.it> <83a6jn4gpq.fsf@gnu.org> <1553192207.19756.1633463102315@mail1.libero.it> <83r1cy2x2q.fsf@gnu.org> <1296031966.62064.1633554406095@mail1.libero.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13986"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.33.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas , Angelo Graziosi , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 06:28:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYL1a-0003O7-TA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:28:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYL1Z-00088S-Fw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYL0O-0007Lu-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:34017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYL0M-0005jY-Ev; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: public@protesilaos.com) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A970C40003; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 04:27:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=217.70.183.194; envelope-from=info@protesilaos.com; helo=relay2-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276473 Archived-At: On 2021-10-06, 17:40 -0400, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Angelo Graziosi writes: > >> What Protesilaos suggested seems to work and it is what I will use on >> Windows and macOS. > > It seems unfortunate if org-mode will suddenly come with a poorly > rendered font on a major platform, where IIUC we previously had > something that was at least okay. > > Are the org-mode developers aware of this issue, and what do they have > to say about it? This has been in Org 9.5 since commit 667cb6f1a on 2021-04-27. I had started the discussion about it in an email from 2020-09-09,[1] in which I had attached a diff. No one commented on it back then and, to my knowledge, none has voiced an opinion about the change ever since. That granted, I now think this is a bad default. Such a feature should be opt-in, otherwise it can catch users by surprise (as shown in this discussion---also related is bug#46971 for which I sent a patch with regard to the modus-themes). Can Org be patched for emacs-28? How does this work in terms of syncing with org.git? My suggestion would be to revert commit 667cb6f1a in org.git, though I am not sure how to proceed. What do you think? [1] -- Protesilaos Stavrou https://protesilaos.com