From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 859190f 2/3: Convert some keymaps to defvar-keymap Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:58:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6jbtgjf.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20211004081724.6281.11798@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83tuhlnkxm.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c2f359a71f49@heytings.org> <83czo9nj4g.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c244b9db0bea@heytings.org> <834k9lnd2i.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c2dff3b49971@heytings.org> <83k0ign3zj.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c26fb6f0233a@heytings.org> <838rywm7a7.fsf@gnu.org> <9865db3af5547c6ca15c@heytings.org> <9865db3af561bf9f05d1@heytings.org> <87mtnbv2q1.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7djv0j4.fsf@gnus.org> <87czo7uyxl.fsf@gnus.org> <878ryvuylj.fsf@gnus.org> <871r4nl3di.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30425"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gregory Heytings , Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 14 23:59:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mb8lQ-0007h6-9c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:59:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36760 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mb8lP-0000ri-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:59:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mb8kI-00007x-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:59164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mb8kH-0006tT-7L; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:58:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IpFQwXSh9uTF26ThuDaGDz1Pabb7hHewMy14TGpxoV8=; b=BZhaC/mdYF7ohT2OlA3WtE7yJe +1vvETlg2CAI4tJeyHRzTAmvIKXHKyvcbjcZtygwnxy/Fsxg+3aJteSDOE3O9DPCPOnFAcQdEfygZ DL9AqlKgBs64vw842195RMq59dIMhBjj5PVZ/nfVc4K5WVF/fMx0U9557QdpofUc4Yc0=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mb8k9-00065a-1m; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:58:31 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Espen Reinertsen's _Forgaflingspop_: "Fnugg" In-Reply-To: <871r4nl3di.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:10:01 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277073 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > [t] also means default binding. Ah, yeah. So it's definitely a no go. A variant would be possible -- I mean, by putting in some more syntax. Like: [:C-c C-c] [:t] [:M-] [-C-c C-c] [{C-c C-c}] But... I'm not sure that's super attractive. It's too much of a trick, too. ["C-c C-c"] The string-in-a-vector syntax is the easiest to handle -- it's very regular, well-understood syntax that doesn't look magical. And since it's totally non-ambiguous, and we could make it error out on everything that's not valid. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no