From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:51:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6j0hv4d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8735ow151j.fsf@zoho.eu> <875ytqrw23.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35265"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.7.3; emacs 29.0.50 Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 23 15:13:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1meGph-0008xY-7Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:13:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57476 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meGpd-0001km-Sa for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meEcj-0001C9-Ax for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meEcg-0001li-OH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E845C0459; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:51:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= references:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=LI6eaBuhEezK2Y8YxIjjBgObmC hdZC6PpZKS7SmOPOo=; b=UeMwYnVmpqgLz2HD6q6FxahSSy4PUs1SXPIhUBhFf2 Hxcnu6PsqBeLaBxrVVgmrwV+mTdP6HuWIVi284pOENDL2ntNhmdc4hoyLrHqpaT9 Vb9o8abUTk567KadBAzkahY5bAL4tE2Sij1d2/XepevtYI4bUKwXHSa9wWpUVXcI 4n3zqTpLxdDd8ZNt96OsbZF92SV4Sp8Z0CM9u8gLPjL9tlxWdcTQ/IWmfhKX/fQ1 2sbIbuHt/EEN3AufOYDtmOrCr13iWZo+E9GJyHcFMyywYHuiEW2Q9+Aw1wnwiFHR 9DE98GZPt7g2aNNcjACrFeRZ+ifYfsGa2D0g1n4TZu8g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LI6eaB uhEezK2Y8YxIjjBgObmChdZC6PpZKS7SmOPOo=; b=HaRQ1uHhGxvG14330ktxve dRfvYcNauyt1m5N/+gvwRKyWet6AfnIXubt0tG/dAtlnAnBxPZs84zrq+sKKNz18 0GZU/LObuHDzKss6rOqQwfiV7UKUBLwhImcRuR7XikB5j5p7muvtGfkwrKZVLqMK E2zGf6wfP/uY8t0M39RNmigmlMt4sX0Qn9EvvuaNzBiJ40M0abUHdP8/R+k3B/LT b7TsMQAoqvJjvFzreC0naJJGyBG34OVkwA04LC+yUMLflpoKaUvYgM5ErRh2gRqz k9bh2oZOKiYQ3o45RdHQNEX7/Re0RzFA/LK3kTFqLR7oBEU7bsYGDLlCjVZqqjCQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdeftddgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpehffgfhvffuffgjkfggtgesthdtre dttdertdenucfhrhhomhepvfgrshhsihhlohcujfhorhhnuceothhhohhrnhdoghhnuhes fhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehteehfeehleekieeule ekhfeludefheekveeigfdvffehieeuhefgveefhfdvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdoghhnuhesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:51:31 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <875ytqrw23.fsf@zoho.eu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=thorn+gnu@fastmail.fm; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:12:00 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:134053 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor writes: >>>> M-x irc >>> >>> That way you get Rcirc ... not recommended, use ERC. >> >> M-x irc works so fine. > > I hope so :) > > But I think ERC is more powerful and now (it wasn't always > like that) it seems to have a very active little team of > developers working on it at a very high skill level! Hey, don't underestimate the work Philip Kaludercic has done in rcirc lately, e.g., support for several IRCv3 features, and support for SASL authentication! Also note that "rcirc" is almost part of his lastname which suggests a bright future, doesn't it? > BTW maybe ERC should be invoked on M-x irc RET ? I think that's off the table. Users who always used M-x irc RET shouldn't face a situation where another client is invoked and their configs are disregarded. Bye, Tassilo