From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: face-remap-add-relative versus set-face-attribute Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 01:59:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6evvax9.fsf@zoho.eu> References: Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13168"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:BKhkqKGiFbaBLmv/X934hqoLtjM= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 13 02:00:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJ3FO-0003Do-EC for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 02:00:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJ3FM-0006oj-Q1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 20:00:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJ3Eu-0006oZ-Dk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 19:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:37516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJ3Es-0001mM-Lj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 19:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJ3Eo-0002Z5-JP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 01:59:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135916 Archived-At: goncholden via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote: > What is superior > > Using (face-remap-add-relative 'default :weight 'bold) > > or using > > (set-face-attribute 'font-lock-comment-face nil :weight normal) ? They don't do the same thing ... But the second is good, except I don't think one needs to `quote' font-lock-comment-face. It is however needed for font-lock-regexp-grouping-backslash and font-lock-regexp-grouping-construct - I don't know why this discrepancy is ... Don't forget about font-lock-comment-delimiter-face BTW ... And try this ... (defun set-all-faces (fg &optional bg weight) (let ((backg (or bg "black")) (wght (or weight 'normal)) (faces) ) (mapatoms (lambda (s) (when (facep s) (push (symbol-name s) faces) ))) (dolist (f faces) (set-face-attribute (intern f) nil :foreground fg) :background backg :weight wght :italic nil) )) (set-all-faces "red") -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal