From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display of undisplayable characters: \U01F3A8 instead of diamond Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:05:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87a67oxhfb.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <83tu5wy7jb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37393"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:8n/Na1iniVuRQnWPW6dMqUGr3oQ= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 28 22:06:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oSOYI-0009Us-KB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:06:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSOYH-0007sr-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 16:06:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSOXN-00077v-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 16:05:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:35968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSOXL-0007Zp-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 16:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oSOXJ-000885-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:05:37 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294262 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > No text terminal can support all the key combinations a GUI > display can. Why ever not? > The Linux console is abysmally inadequate for Emacs, from > where I stand. In terms of text, what's missing? But it is atypical for Linux because it isn't feature-rich, they don't try to make it better, and they don't add stuff, this is a policy, even. But if one uses feature-rich systems on top of it or with it, for example tmux which is very common, here Emacs as we have heard, zsh, etc, I don't see how they should be limited by it, really? But it is possible/likely that fbterm, if that is the feature-rich option then, that the other posted suggested in this thread, that that is indeed more powerful and offers a more consistent configuration and extension interface, active development and all that ... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal