From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:20:27 +0000 Message-ID: <87a5zdtexw.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <83zg7e8d2d.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7nt8x8a.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz49lar3.fsf@gmail.com> <83wn2h77f7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 15:21:30 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaPh-0006vR-9F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:21:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaPL-0002Ck-LP; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaPH-0002BL-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaPG-0001Cq-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaPF-0000Ul-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16813056111815 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 13:20:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaOQ-0000TB-Uz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:51719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaOL-0000SM-Iq for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 730F124041A for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:19:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1681305599; bh=IwIIR7QWhXdryfPPgxtZ8ReVHhx5G5zXhvb2agOiigk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=bj72xWruIkK0v/k/Kr2IDnqwmw/M8WzDoEafL0EMmJ1mYoSbI/LQGizPrPUMEhusG 3I2bYILh9PWh4/NlZ+TxP6ETcZrlh913LptI9HRKz8MOvZC3e5PJxxvQH5RplhQ1Mq 9cKilrcZW/2V6PU1EAxUnW4o1flIbUeUvFVEuPYwSxPrZzOXk2vnDbiDTCLCcfdqDh tJdeBOtFXg3xrg5FIvM8L51ZvSJ+THG4bmNCChW3hjg7To12jt8kF9nHbNTLLs9jwa PdfIPvVNhVwJVj9ek9rCuUy/NGagQ6GxGR1MVS7iOuDvx2br6hJDOtPxHth4q9YKo7 o0piJ9Nbgf6Pw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PxNby208Hz9rxF; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:19:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83wn2h77f7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:53:48 +0300") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259736 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora >> Cc: philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, >> 62720@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:18:08 +0100 >>=20 >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>=20 >> >> Btw, why, when I do "M-x list-packages RET", I see Eglot in red with >> >> Status "incompat"? If I press RET on its name, I see >> >>=20 >> >> Package eglot is incompatible. >> >>=20 >> >> Status: Incompatible because it depends on uninstallable pack= ages. >> >>=20 >> >> Why is that? >> >>=20 >> >> No idea. Is this with our without my patch? >> > >> > Without. >>=20 >> I can't reproduce this in a recent emacs-29. Here's what I start Emacs >> with >>=20 >> HOME=3D`mktemp -d` && src/emacs -Q -f list-packages >>=20 >> I get: >>=20 >> Status: Available from gnu -- [Install] > > I did just > > emacs -Q > M-x list-packages RET > > and I still see what I described. > > I get the same if I point HOME to a scratch empty directory. > > Maybe it's a Windows thing? why are some dependencies marked as "not > available"? > > Package eglot is incompatible. > > Status: Incompatible because it depends on uninstallable packages. > Archive: gnu > Version: 1.14 > Commit: 8125d4cfc5605ead9102b7d823c4241029eb76cc > Summary: The Emacs Client for LSP servers > Requires: emacs-26.3, jsonrpc-1.0.16, flymake-1.2.1, > project-0.9.8 (not available), xref-1.6.2 (not available), > eldoc-1.14.0, seq-2.23 (not available), > external-completion-0.1 (not available) On GNU/Linux: I have experienced a similar issue to this one in the past, but found that it resolved itself without any action on my end after a while. Sadly I did not take the time to investigate what is going on, but I believe that this is a subtle bug in package.el.