From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 18:30:24 +0800 Message-ID: <87a5u6p4n3.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87bkenqprn.fsf@yahoo.com> <87v8curzxm.fsf@localhost> <87ledqp69i.fsf@yahoo.com> <87jztaryzk.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Kangas , Danny Freeman , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 12:31:39 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1RD-00068b-CV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:31:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1QJ-0001Ps-MC; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:30:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1QI-0001NZ-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:30:42 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic309-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.184.146]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1QF-0006P0-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:30:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1693564237; bh=wOlDeEJLCMHePA7TphpnXmyXuLWmwp3jBVVcVXFiZFc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=HZCKYC79QX73gBBU5HYYJ5Pae2xvF/IrcgXNdclG8scUUeNTGrHFE873irNfv/ixOqG/SlqNzCfPlTR/Qd6xv3gIz/pXGavJ+w8pl8NPR6Lh39tQ1A2pe7C0eMqfdShb3xgykP47O3pe1cT/DSNksyXHxWBtYMvfeaOCyRfcm/wNkE4icVL2J2KiNiDTMElx7RWbSuBMQw1vWjEEAaoa15+YbwOa56Y0XYyEPCmOa1WhLAY2NordoI+JgEGS0NnmC0E2kGszYsgLvaH0RVj62+aRh5GtybvkmF8ccb+OwpYMa1/UR9bLQLukym6hkWdVujYSIDRwYHIQRJ0S9MpDDQ== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1693564237; bh=U0KmTMTNVvgFqLrK6tpaAE7x51inEBMzWRHAceeUxjZ=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=VpcOjGlBOGhX1ujJAOjxwMde7n+IQvKi5uC6O4Wg6oNV/FKMc/5WYhngDWkDgU+RsPxfinCsAjSCXNEj799ntwh+GkPZHWGoiZLSesLypu48jTVBQAmsABXV2M37NB+IxXO0GTLVkQqo2ArNzJBm+cJuVVuXs/ZkQyozuWwwCHoYV9frD4UrAvMVDPQcd6Phr029F+eP3xdXlcINE2mpcyHsTPw4GYnmbiqw3kdfJCxsO4YAtEygV6LRmv3HGetdT7qbcwCRP+5H2Dl8iHTbEycNQcLTzxCu375ByA+GYt5yy26gczPYU1cmLDXxgzecIh6RXtJs+1y/pJXx4rYUHg== X-YMail-OSG: .m9xu2QVM1k5a6owagl914lUR89i6DfTt9UX77Nc6IwVS2TYw8EtueprFg5hfn1 FvqjKc1TNCM2tmY8RbDfJ5ajFCR0q3h7jYXiCBebQEVDzLwJSXurZFSP__.h6YYXY92.aNd.cIAI B.HbDNbwBUapv8HgeV24g.YLVjbr.eFBk8unYjA3lNRCrHOQT6cZE4OyFt5D9eJhtIgUOFC2e5K_ JgNA9wrWcXqn3TQ8Aem5IeQN.4JdzNEoAISr4qYAZemXgyhlBoSEnNWlP7nPItSVotzCNvVCxSLc 1U_RZpxz2bjpA.dod6JelndWHe3pzLO3u417qEBuKeMS9X5WOf1z6siIZ2nLM8ugdi36SGT3FSHK GJAbEDcztFZz6K4WIdsd25AXKrTrh.MR3kHFZ2NMvkorZGikYxyiw.eVydU6syAma.pnlhoBjj9b iEIDlcOVDNfKkotQwNWpB5Eb7t4gYvJnekx1Oy_NjRBL0AzJ7JV_I4rxr51EQW8D0RuR34cRI0hP rqXuRfdZt8jmsZcnBcJgP2RCmQZYuX7wy8HVOJ4V6SHKFBc4Tmq5VIt2tHe9x8TwxTRMwEhQ.wXz cRlsWayvCxmPFJhKOIxJl24qTDrCoMDTmECdSudDce9AG.Uns8GwejG_x39decbI0Xpsci_0RGo2 8N1qx9I.EPm4gbiPfJ1.rEWxvIT2PgU64amj8aKNz4Gpmtp4gMJWhme6d5mO4kXV.4gEOrTUtAhY bNvvex46lO_CZApzBPtbGfzPGqgr8SjZ5DoZR22.WKEjhCyRmWNgxNjmVwpwhElcCw0FLu6BQu9Y FLgXOQOd2cEGYsxOCd4YdckK07dkuTjepS97gu0e5f X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: 755efb76-a821-4476-afed-ef7b2b98a3ce Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:30:37 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-69654d8bd-752gm (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7364a4243968ce87bdfe1bc71c9f12de; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:30:31 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87jztaryzk.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:04:15 +0000") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.21763 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.184.146; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic309-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309753 Archived-At: Ihor Radchenko writes: > From my understanding, it is also possible, although in limited way > (because of lack of reply branching in Discourse). emacs-china admins > may know better though - I'm just looking up Discourse docs. I'm inclined to believe them. > not the case for all people, but it is really hard to jump in with > random seemingly unrelated request for someone like me). So we are obliged to sign up for more trouble, because of certain individuals' ungrounded and moreover untrue qualms about etiquette? Wouldn't we be better served by explaining how that _is_ acceptable? > Also, it does not feel reliable - I know very well how people forget > Reply All, let alone deliberately adding somebody in CC. Especially in > an active discussion where the participants may not immediately (or at > all) see a random email at the bottom of the thread tree. When you witness this, feel free to complain. It is a legitimate greviance.