Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> Manuel Giraud <manuel@ledu-giraud.fr> writes:
>
>> Alright.  But in such case, I do not really know what to say: I am
>> adding one argument to all callers based on its siblings' values.
>
> In this (and only this) case, our practice is to omit functions modified
> solely to introduce the new argument from the log message, and to append
> to the entry designating the recipient of the new argument the words
> ``All callers changed.''
>
> So long as the default value for the argument is straightforward, of
> course.  If computing the argument demands non-trivial changes, then the
> ChangeLog should relate them as it would any other.

What about this patch then?