From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67600: [PATCH] Add dashes to 'thing-at-point-email-regexp' Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:50:27 +0000 Message-ID: <87a5qanqvg.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87v89fh2iz.fsf@posteo.net> <83plzn77i2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmtjnaxd.fsf@posteo.net> <831qbrvd5g.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzpetoo3.fsf@posteo.net> <838r5umfmw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35219"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 67600@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 16 15:51:13 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rEW0W-00091Z-Or for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 15:51:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rEW0P-0006Pm-9H; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 09:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rEW0N-0006PO-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 09:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rEW0L-0001XE-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 09:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rEW0M-0005vT-Bp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 09:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67600 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 67600-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67600.170273823922749 (code B ref 67600); Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2023 14:50:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rEVzz-0005ur-9n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 09:50:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:56121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rEVzv-0005uZ-8D for 67600@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 09:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73EB1240101 for <67600@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 15:50:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1702738228; bh=DBPEjiJBFIFHwftzoY9Y6mbg9EC+hEMmMOte+21nzs0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=n+/3wuB9s6v3IWxEQK4e9Weic8sZCcl+rQLP1PXlwFXY9SGiJ/gMyOwfoQPljnO1G bo5jBrzt1xJbJIR4oPmqw4q23EQ+TZ0fMuWZUduqjVAn3JaGV4fuAHb6fZF3x+PXWB WUftjDSJffz1nWL0L0bfq85nTWf1fntDZDyezf9f48mtcmftHEo4o1H6ux4Vwijs+m DxbL5KWz4nqYOttwZd5tDx8cd91I5YE/xw/CLc2Vs4c10mrRHy7r4wb+hz6RjK8Jaq zA2JhwHWEpXmUdP4MSJfXs5jnINMg7Ar+5cE8W9EQFu00ASHYJKydOqP9e2nw1Tk+X pZdZNg1ICxQ1g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Sspsw0JfXz6tyY; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 15:50:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <838r5umfmw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2023 15:38:31 +0200") X-Hashcash: 1:20:231216:67600@debbugs.gnu.org::RYveXCRpU7Eh63dx:ohn X-Hashcash: 1:20:231216:eliz@gnu.org::AUUsTd/bXeDklSo1:75cI Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:276346 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Cc: 67600@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:41:32 +0000 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> >> Cc: 67600@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:21:18 +0000 >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> >> >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> >> >> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 12:52:04 +0000 >> >> >> >> >> >> I noticed this recently when trying to extract a link to an mailing list >> >> >> of mine hosted on SourceHut. >> >> > >> >> > Looks like you are adding slashes, not dashes? >> >> >> >> Of course, my bad: >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > My bother here is that this could cause false positives whereby >> > thing-at-point would recognize file names with slashes as email >> > addresses. Because otherwise I don't understand why the slash was >> > omitted in the first place. Can we somehow make sure this won't >> > happen? >> >> One idea might be to just add slashes to the user name part of the >> address, which would suffice to solve the issue I was having. > > Can you show a patch, so we could make sure we are on the same page? Never mind, I misremembered my own patch, this is already what I am proposing. - "?" + "?" I had falsely assumed that my suggestion was to apply this change - "?" + "?" Which would risk more false positives. -- Philip Kaludercic