From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Permanently fix org versioning breakage during builds? Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 18:12:35 +0000 Message-ID: <87a5pz31ws.fsf@localhost> References: <25989.50971.995591.385250@google.com> <87a5q0dc9m.fsf@localhost> <87y1djc1c9.fsf@localhost> <87zfxzdbna.fsf@yahoo.com> <87plyv7oii.fsf@localhost> <8734vr4prv.fsf@localhost> <835y0nd4ut.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfxz35b4.fsf@localhost> <25992.27078.22115.25251@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87h6k7337x.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33015"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "T.V Raman" , eliz@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 24 19:09:53 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rHSvB-0008M4-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:09:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHSul-0007KG-Py; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:09:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHSuk-0007K5-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHSui-0006QW-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC57240027 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:09:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1703441363; bh=1uEoJkVh6BxodZubjpv4l5lKgZopFiamIE6t8ubbBVc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=rmk0u51gJct6b0JRUq/qq50LpATuDJoD1eom7MoeSIU/p8FoG3l/K0ZLtFUU6xAPL EPIePMG3CBeWqNnsXz+xc3htVsJGKqhP3TwiCMWVeT14TundMF+s9X31mulfdhtVWW zzd3mjucCZyzMt6lesuuLLdWIDcn4C5OzARBeBssX34RbTrhUj24DT93oqjiIkq4xl tnQ2khS1TWoyq7qRQdcp3EtcmnYxi1GYvszLw7shGPGVLE3W5ToouTjFFouZIMegaU XF9makHW6llydOBx4jIQ3/aF5mBKBS6p99QLH1k6qa9l1Z3aNpB1DohgRZp+UsKBl2 lx7iSap3x4mOA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Sypvk6CbLz9rxB; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:09:22 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314163 Archived-At: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: >> The versions I am talking about are bugfix releases. >> Not installing them means missing out on the containing bug fixes. > > User can get these bug fixes with a simple `M-x package-install` or > `M-x package-update` (perhaps with one of more prefix arguments, not sure, > or via an extra variable). That's the way it works with Eglot, for > example. > You have to weigh what is worse. A slightly-buggy-in-obscure-corners-Org > that keeps the master build clean and manages to load most org files or > the efforts it takes to update a package from ELPA/git. I'd prefer to keep Org version in Emacs tree more up-to-date. --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at