From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:43:14 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87a5cuhjv1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87r06a3yfg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zfkx2ydr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8734io2hac.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5232"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/31.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Nicolas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Despr=E8s?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Liu Hui Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 08:48:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNSJc-0001GM-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:48:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNSIh-0001bm-Gm; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 02:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNSIa-0001bP-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 02:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNSIX-0005JH-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 02:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6AFCE0003; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 07:47:14 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Liu Hui's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:51:40 +0800") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.196; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay4-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326574 Archived-At: > I have the same problem when using emacs. Thank you for the patch. > > I think the main reason is that vertical split is always preferred > when vertical and horizontal split are both feasible (i.e. width > > split-width-threshold and height > split-height-threshold). > > So it seems unnecessary to compare the width and height. How about > adding an option, e.g. split-window-preferred-direction split-window-preferred-direction is a better option name indeed.